trailmark-variant-neighborhood
Expands one confirmed or suspected vulnerability into a Trailmark graph neighborhood of variant candidates by finding sibling functions, shared callers and callees, common sensitive sinks, common entrypoint paths, interface implementations, override relationships, type/reference neighbors, and structurally similar nodes. Use after one issue is found to seed variant-analysis, semgrep-rule-creator, static-analysis, or manual review with graph-derived candidate locations.
0
GitHub Stars
0
估算安装量
85
质量评分
📖 Skill 指令
Trailmark Variant Neighborhood
Expand one seed issue into graph-derived variant candidates. This skill generates review targets, not confirmed findings.
When to Use
- A finding is confirmed or plausible and variants may exist - The vulnerable pattern depends on call context - The issue involves a shared sink, source, validator, interface, override, trait, hook, handler, adapter, or critical type - The next step is to seed `variant-analysis`, `semgrep-rule-creator`, `static-analysis`, or manual review
When NOT to Use
- No seed issue exists. Use discovery or triage first. - The pattern is purely syntactic and already obvious. Use `semgrep-rule-creator` directly. - The question is exploit-chain composition across multiple findings. Use a composition workflow. - The goal is remediation verification. Use a remediation-review workflow. - The seed cannot be bound to a graph node.
Rationalizations to Reject
| Rationalization | Why It Is Wrong | Required Action | |---|---|---| | "Nearby code means variant" | Proximity is only a candidate reason | Rank it as a review target | | "Only exact same names matter" | Variants often share sinks or preconditions, not names | Expand across callers, callees, interfaces, and types | | "Every candidate is a finding" | This skill outputs candidates for review | Avoid vulnerability claims | | "Unreachable candidates can be ignored completely" | They may become reachable after refactors | Rank lower or list as deferred | | "Graph candidates replace semantic pattern work" | Graph structure finds locations, not root-cause semantics | Hand off to variant-analysis, Semgrep, CodeQL, or manual review |
Workflow
``` Variant Neighborhood Progress: - [ ] Step 1: Normalize and bind the seed - [ ] Step 2: Expand graph neighborhoods - [ ] Step 3: Rank candidates - [ ] Step 4: Extract variant pattern guidance - [ ] Step 5: Emit handoff packet ``` ### Step 1: Normalize And Bind The Seed Accept finding text, file/line, function name, or output from `trailmark-finding-triage`. Bind the seed to a Trailmark node and record the root cause in plain language. If the seed has no concrete graph binding, stop before inventing variants. ### Step 2: Expand Neighborhoods Use the dimensions in [references/neighborhood-patterns.md](references/neighborhood-patterns.md): - shared callers - shared callees and sinks - entrypoint path neighbors - interface, override, trait, and implementation siblings - file or module cluster neighbors - taint or privilege-boundary peers - type and state-reference neighbors Bound expansion to avoid candidate floods. ### Step 3: Rank Candidates Rank with [references/ranking.md](references/ranking.md). Prioritize entrypoint-reachable, tainted, boundary-adjacent, high-blast-radius, shared sink, same-interface, and close-distance candidates. Penalize test, mock, generated, vendor, unreachable, and trusted-internal-only candidates. ### Step 4: Extract Pattern Guidance Summarize what should be searched for syntactically and what requires semantic review. Identify whether follow-up belongs in: - `variant-analysis` - `semgrep-rule-creator` - `static-analysis` with CodeQL or SARIF-producing tools - manual review ### Step 5: Emit Handoff Packet Use [references/output-format.md](references/output-format.md). Include ranked candidates, inclusion reasons, exclusions, limitations, and the variant-analysis handoff.
Stop Conditions
- No graph binding exists - Candidate count is too high and the root cause is underspecified - Trailmark cannot analyze the target language - The seed is only in test, generated, or vendor code and the user did not say that code is in scope
🏷️ 标签
cicodeqlformathandoffnextnodeormrefactorreviewsemgrepspectestuivulnerabilityworkflow